Neuroscience Models

Home Up

How the BRAIN Works

 

Triune Brain Model

Paul MacLean (1973) conceived of the brain as being three brains in one, each with a different phylogenetic history, each with its own intelligence, its own special memory, its own sense of time and space, and its own motor functions. 

Jim Henry  argued that the dominant left cerebral hemisphere is a fourth, phylogenetically most recent, system peculiar to our species (Henry & Stephens, 1977).

Based on these two theories, Stevens & Price (2000) propose a model of human brain evolution.  They argue the brain evolved in four stages, leaving our brain with four distinct regions: the reptilian, paleo-mammalian and neo-cortex, which reflect their ancestral roots in terms of the types of behaviours they contribute to. 

The model resonates with the models that Freud, Jung and Plato espoused, in perceiving the mind as possessing separate functional components, which compete with each other for overall control of behaviour.  The paradigm overlaps with Evolutionary Psychology's Modularism and Edelman & Tononi's concept of degeneracy in their neuroscientific model. 

The model instructs evolutionary theories of adaptive & maladaptive depression & PTSD.

Stevens & Price (2000) propose four evolutionary developmental stages of the human brain

1. Reptilian brain

Basal ganglia, olfacto-striatum and corpus striatum. 

The most primitive cerebral component, containing algorithms vital to maintaining life.  The behavioural responses at this level are largely governed by instinct, such as defence, dominance striving, agonistic threat displays and mating. 

2. Limbic (paleo-mammalian brain)

Subcortical structures comprising the limbic system, including the hippocampus, hypothalamus, thalamus & pituitary gland.  It controls self homeostasis, emotion, hunger, sexual desire, sleep and memory.  

MacLean draws attention to three forms of behaviour that distinguishes the evolutionary transition from reptiles to mammals: nursing & maternal care, audio-vocal communication between mother-offspring, and play.  MacLean suggests that the separation call, which served to maintain mother-offspring proximity, evolved to maintain contact between members of a group, and that play evolved as a means to promote group harmony & affiliation.

3. Neocortex (neo-mammalian brain)

Responsible for cognition & sophisticated perceptual processes.  Behaviour originating in the neocortex is often described as voluntary and rational, reflecting its intellectual nature. 

4. Lateralisation

The lateralisation of function between the two hemispheres, with a left dominant hemisphere responsible for language and speech.

 

 

Theory of Neuronal Group Selection (or Neural Darwinism)

This is a "global brain theory" that takes the position that the brain is a Darwinian system following the principles of Natural Selection, whose "rich" functioning is the result of its enormous variability & individuality (Edelman & Tononi, 2000).

The evolutionary model proposed by Edelman & Tononi shows how different proximal & distal neural maps connect & interact with each other, producing a holistic organismic "self" & unitary responses to the environment.  These neural maps are reminiscent of the mental modules of Evolutionary Psychology and the "central processing assemblies" of the Triune brain.

Edelman & Tononi argue that Darwin's "population principle" explains: (1) Natural selection : that variations among individuals of a species that leads eventually to the origin of other species due to differential reproduction of those individuals with higher "fitness", and (2) Somatic selection : selection & variation occurring in the animal's cellular systems within an individual's body during the individual's lifespan. 

The first two tenets of the Theory of Neuronal Group Selection provide the basis for the great variability & differentiation of distributed neuronal states that accompany consciousness (and the states & disorders that result from loss of differentiation).  The third tenet allows for the integration of those states.

Tenet 1: Developmental selection : The formation during brain development of a a highly diverse, variant set of neuronal circuits, arising from genetic constraints & somatic selection.  An important property is that "neurons that fire together wire together" (neurons strengthen & weaken their connections according to individual patterns of electrical activity). 

 

Fig 1 (from Edelman & Tononi, 2000)

Tenet 2: Experiential selection : Synaptic selection resulting from experience changing the strength of neural circuits, refining brain maps into internal representations of the environment. 

Fig 2 (from Edelman & Tononi, 2000)

Tenet 3: Re-entry : This is the process of neuronal integration that permits coordination in space & time of brain maps, through ongoing signalling across reciprocal connections.  Re-entry is a dynamic process that is the central mechanism by which the spatiotemporal coordination of diverse sensory and motor events occurs.  It takes place through the correlation of selective events across the maps of the brain, leading to synchronisation of the activity in the different neuronal maps, binding them into circuits capable of temporally coherent output.  This process is made possible by the massively parallel reciprocal connectivity of brain areas by the brain's thalamo-cortical system.  An example of a neuronal map is the internal representation of environmental space in the mammalian hippocampus.  Mice have particularly well-developed hippocampi, comparable to that of humans, although mice are particularly good at memorising space but not different humans. 

Fig 3 (from Edelman & Tononi, 2000)

Re-entry functions to: (1) assist the special brain centres to categorise sensory input (2) mediate the synthesis of brain functions by connecting sub-modalities (3) resolve conflicts among competing neural signals (4) make local synaptic changes context-dependent (changes in the efficacy of synapses in one area are affected by activation patterns of distant areas) (5) it is the main mechanism for neuronal integration, by assuring spatiotemporal correlation of neuronal firing. 

Edelman & Tononi contrast the selectional nature of this system, as opposed to the instructional nature of computer networks.  They argue against the notion that the brain operates according to an unambiguous set of algorithms or instructions like a computer.  They propose that "re-entry organisation is what uniquely characterises & differentiates higher brains from all other known objects & systems." (Edelman & Tononi, 2000)

Loss of integration results in distinct neuropsychiatric disorders

Other features of their theory include:

Degeneracy : the property whereby structurally different components yield similar results (multiple paths lead to the same output).  They relate this property to the thalamocortical system such that a large number of different neuronal groups can similarly affect the output of a given subset of neurones (a large number of brain circuits can lead to the same motor output). They propose that degeneracy is a consequence of natural selection and results in increased robustness & adaptability of biological networks. 

Value system : constraints are provided by this family of phenotypic neuronal circuits that have been selected over evolutionary time.  Each of the neural circuits modulate synaptic function in widespread regions throughout the brain.  These systems provide "constraints", providing a basis for the development & refinement of brain-based categorisation & action within a species.

 

 

Mental Emotional Modules

Neuroscientist Joseph LeDoux perceives the brain to be made up of mental modules.  His research focuses on the brain's emotional system, specifically the organisation of the fear module of the brain.  

In his seminal work The Emotional Brain, LeDoux described his research on the limbic system.  He comments on the general nature of emotions: (1) The term "emotion" is a label referring not to something the mind or brain has or does but to the feelings that result from activating specific neural systems that have evolved to solve different problems that animals face.  (2) There is no single emotional system.  The system we use to defend against danger is different from the one we use in procreation.  The brain systems that generate emotional behaviours (i.e. mental emotional modules) do so to assist to fulfil their biological imperative to pass their genes to their offspring.  Each neural system accomplishes its behavioural goals, such as obtaining food & shelter, protection from bodily harm, & procreation.  (3) Conscious emotional experiences result from the activation of these neural systems in the presence of a conscious brain.  Most emotional processing is generated unconsciously, as is cognitive processing, with only the outcome of these processes entering awareness, & only in some instances.  (4) Emotional experiences are just a part of the overall activation of the emotional modules reacting to environmental triggers.  LeDoux suggests they are not necessarily the central function of the systems that generate them.  (5)  He suggests that most mental disorders are emotional disorders.  (6) The states of consciousness that occur with conscious feelings (emotions) are no different from other states such as awareness (& categorisation) of an external object.  He argues that states of consciousness occur when the mental module responsible for awareness focuses on the activity occurring in an otherwise unconscious mental module.  (7) People set up situations to modulate their emotions but have little direct control over their emotional reactions.  Emotional modules are dominant over cognitive modules.  (8) Emotions are powerful motivators of future behaviours.

 

 

 home

EPIG ] Evolutionary Models ] EP Classification ] EP Seminar 2006 ]

 

Citation suggestion: Dr Gary Galambos, Neuroscience Models, Evolutionary Psychiatry Interest Group Sydney Australia (http://www.ep.org.au/models/neurosc.htm) [date accessed]
The materials provided on this website may be freely cited but reposting on other websites, publishing or other reproductions, whole or in part, are subject to the written permission of Gary Galambos. Images may be reproduced provided the source is properly acknowledged.  
Site Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Dr Gary Galambos M.B.B.S. F.R.A.N.Z.C.P.
Page last updated: 05 September 2006