EP Classification

Home Classification Grid

EVOLUTIONARY CLASSIFICATION OF HUMAN  PSYCHOPATHOLOGY: 
The Malfunction-Dysregulation-Asocialisation (MDA) Model 
(© Galambos 2005, 2006, 2007):

CONTENTS

Introducing the Evolutionary Classification Grid

Definitions

Background

Plotting the DSM Disorders within the Classificatory Grid

Lecture

 

Introducing the Evolutionary Classification Grid

This classificatory system of mental disorders attempts to place DSM disorders (based on a non-aetiological descriptive classificatory system) and the Bio-PsychoSocial model within an explanatory/aetiological i.e. evolutionary framework.  

I propose an evolutionary classification system that requires a two-dimensional grid to explain any of the diagnostic behavioural syndromes identified by the DSM syndromal system.  Each DSM descriptive disorder may have more than one possible aetiological basis and thus may reflect more than one grid cell. Thus, two individual patients may manifest the same DSM syndrome (and appear identical in terms of symptoms and signs) but have totally different causes (aetiology).  

EVOLUTIONARY CLASSIFICATION DISORDER: x


Archetypal Disruption
Disorders of:

A
Attachment/
Affiliation Archetype

B
Hierarchical/
Ranking Archetype

C
Courtship/ Mating
Archetype

D
Threat Response Archetype

1. Malf-
unction

1.1
Modular

1.1A

1.1B

1.1C

1.1D

1.2
Integrative

1.2A

1.2B

1.2C

1.2D

2. Dys-
regulation

2.1 Environmental Uniqueness

2.1A

2.1B

2.1C

2.1D

2.2
Maladaptive Meme

2.2A

2.2B

2.2C

2.2D

3. Asocialisation

3.1
By-product (trade off)

3.1A

3.1B

3.1C

3.1D

3.2
Defense
3.2A 3.2B 3.2C 3.2D

I argue that the general evolutionary explanations  (vertical y-axis) and the organism-specific archetypal (functional) disruption (horizontal x-axis) should be grouped together because they are complementary for any organismic dysfunction.  

General evolutionary explanations have been derived from the work of a number of researchers in the area (most notable is Nesse (1999)) and my system nicely mirrors that of the the Bio-PsychoSocial model (Engel 1980) used in psychiatry to develop formulations to explain why a mental disorder has developed in a particular individual at that point in their life course, which ideally should be considered alongside atheoretical DSM diagnoses.  Malfunction correlates with "Bio", Dysfunction with "Psycho" and Sociability with "Socio".  Maintaining a BPS framework makes the evolution from an atheoretical to a theoretical classification system that much easier, whilst providing a solution for the Descartian Bio-PsychoSocial dualism inherent in BPS model and DSM, which leads to multiple problems that I have indicated elsewhere.  

There are three evolutionary explanations, corresponding to the BPS framework: Disorders of 1. Malfunction, 2. Dysregulation, and 3. Sociability.  These are defined below.  I propose that there is a left to right flow effect, with disorders of Malfunction, Dysregulation and Sociability leading to the functional disruptions of the archetypal systems (A-D). 

Archetypal disruption is derived mainly from the work of Stevens & Price (2000), who argue that mental disorders result from a failure to meet biosocial imperatives by lifespan-specific context-sensitive archetypal propensities

The association between these processes has been modelled by plotting them along x-y axes, with a resultant grid of 6 general evolutionary explanations and 4 archetypal disruptions, resulting in 24 possible evolutionary classifications. 

Thus, each DSM disorder may have anywhere between 1-24 possible evolutionary explanations.  Each archetypal disorder may have up to 6 possible causes, and each evolutionary explanation (e.g. disorders of modular malfunction - 1.1) may disrupt anywhere between 1-4 of the 4 evolved archetypes.  

EVOLUTIONARY CLASSIFICATION DISORDER: x


Archetypal Disruption
Disorders of:

A
Attachment/
Affiliation Archetype

B
Hierarchical/
Ranking Archetype

C
Courtship/ Mating
Archetype

D  
Threat Response Archetype

1. Malf-
unction

1.1
Modular

1

7

13

19

1.2
Integrative

2

8

14

20

2. Dys-
regulation

2.1 Environmental Uniqueness

3

9

15

21

2.2
Maladaptive Meme

4

10

16

22

3. Asocialisation

3.1
By-product (trade off)

5

11

17

23

3.2
Defense
6 12 18 24

 

 

 

DEFINITIONS

Definitions of the 3 types of Evolutionary Explanation and 4 types of Archetypal Disruption follow:

Evolutionary explanations

  1. Disorders of Malfunction

    1.1 Modular - Mental disorders that result from localised (modular) brain malfunction due to abnormal differentiation, usually secondary to genetic vulnerability or injuries of the developing central nervous system 

    1.2 Integrative - Mental disorders that result from NON-localised brain malfunction due to genetic vulnerability or injuries of the developing central nervous system, causing widespread cerebral dysconnectivity.  

    This classification should not be confused with the situation of a solitary modular malfunction that leads to an unopposed effect in other modules, causing an "imbalance" to result (between separate modules) - this is not a primary integrative malfunction, but rather, it is a modular malfunction causing secondary effects in other modules (the "garbage in = garbage out" effect)

     

  2. Disorders of Dysregulation  - Mental disorders that result from dysregulation of adaptive responses leading to failure to achieve specific biosocial goals of the entire organism.  This usually refers to dysregulation of established defenses such that maladaptive symptoms and behaviour result.  (Where defenses are working normally but cause distress to the individual or others, this "disorder" is explained as a Disorder of Sociability 3.2.)

    2.1 Environmental uniqueness - mental disorders may result from normal brain mechanisms becoming dysregulated as a result of exposure to novel environmental circumstances, idiosyncratic learning histories or trauma causing maldevelopment of mind programs. 

    2.2 Maladaptive memes behavioural dysfunction resulting from contagious propagation of maladaptive ideas. 

     

  3. Disorders of Sociability ("Asocialisation") - Mental disorder may be diagnosed if the behaviour of the organism leads to severe subjective distress, objective distress (of the organism's family/community) and negative social or harmful consequences.  These disorders are characterised by behaviours that are not accepted by the individual's local community but may nevertheless be adaptive for the same individual from the perspective of their genes (with regard to  transmission).  Therefore, the behaviour is the by-product of adaptive behaviour for the genes of the organism but not necessarily the organism if the the behaviour results in severe social ostracism.  Another way of putting it is that the memes of the social group to which the individual belongs diverge from that of the adaptive function of the individual's misbehaviour.  

    3.1 By-product (trade off) - Patterns of emotion or behaviour that are painful or socially unacceptable, but nonetheless adaptive. 

    3.2 Defense - An evolved solution to a challenge that may cause suffering & distress as part of the strategy to respond effectively to the threat. 

     

Archetypal disruption

Archetype disorders - Mental disorders may manifest as a failure to meet biosocial imperatives (goals or social roles) by the 4 archetypal propensities (lifespan-specific context-sensitive propensities for behaviours that facilitate inclusive fitness):

  1. Disorders of the Attachment/Affiliation Archetype

  2. Disorders of the Hierarchical Ranking Archetype

  3. Disorders of the Courtship & Mating Archetype

  4. Disorders of the Threat Response Archetype

 


BACKGROUND

There is repetition of some DSM mental disorders*** because this classificatory system is aetiology-based, in contrast to DSM's descriptive classificatory system.  Therefore, there may depressive disorders or anxiety disorders, for example, that result from any or all of these three pathways.  The specific aetiology may or may not have bearing on the symptoms, severity or course of the disorder. 

*** DSM mental disorders:

Developmental - Mental Retardation ; Learning disorders ; Autism, Asperger's ; ADHD ; Tic 

Cognitive Disorders - Delirium ; Dementia ( Alzheimer's , Vascular , Pick's , CJD , Substance-induced ) ; Amnestic ; Personality change due to general medical disorder

Substance-Related disorders
Psychotic disorders - Schizophrenia ; Schizophreniform ; Schizoaffective ; Delusional ; shared psychotic ; due to general medical disorder
Mood disorders - Depressive;  Bipolar I ; Bipolar II ; Dysthymic ; Cyclothymic ; due to general medical disorder
Anxiety disorders - Panic ; Agoraphobia ; Specific phobia ; Social ; OCD; PTSD ; GAD ; Separation anxiety ; due to general medical disorder
Somatoform disorders - Somatisation ; Conversion ; Pain ; Hypochondriasis ; Body Dysmorphic  ; Somatoform
Factitious disorders
Dissociative disorders - Amnesia ; Fugue ; Identity ; Depersonalisation
Sexual disorders - Dysfunction ; Paraphilias ( Exhibitionism , Fetishism , Frotteurism , Pedophilia , Masochism , Sadism , Transvestic Fetishism , Voyeurism )
Gender Identity disorders
Eating disorders - Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa
Sleep disorders - Insomnia ; Hypersomnia ; Parasomnia
Impulse-Control disorders - Explosive ; Kleptomania ; Pyromania ; Pathological Gambling ; Trichotillomania
Adjustment disorders - with depressed mood ; anxiety ; mixed ; conduct disturbance
Personality Disorders - Paranoid ; Schizoid ; Schizotypal ; Antisocial ; Borderline ; Histrionic ; Narcissistic ; Avoidant ; Dependent ; Obsessive-Compulsive
Relational problems - parent-child ; partner ; sibling
Problems related to abuse or neglect - child physical abuse ; child sexual abuse ; child neglect  abuse ; adult physical abuse ; adult sexual abuse
Additional - Non-compliance ; Malingering ; Borderline intellectual functioning ; Age-related cognitive decline ; Bereavement ; Spiritual problem ; Acculturation problem

There have been previous attempts to classify mental disorders using an evolutionary framework.  As early as 1863, Karl Ludwig Kahlbaum (1828 -1899) of East Germany suggested doing so in "Grouping of psychiatric diseases and the classification of mental disorders" based on Carl von Linné's classification of animals and plants (Kahlbaum KL, 1863). Kahlbaum challenged the established psychiatric nosology based on an evolutionary perspective only 4 years after Darwin's epoch-making publication On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1859), whose relevance to psychiatric research Kahlbaum mentioned explicitly [p.178].  Kahlbaum considered psychiatric disorders to be "experimental states provided by nature" and he emphasised what he called the "clinical method" in psychiatry, analogous to the methodology of other natural sciences, consisting of unprejudiced behavioural observation, thorough description and recording of all psychic and somatic phenomena (Kahlbaum, 1874).  Kahlbaum's intention was to link the empirically acquired clinical material with neuropathological correlates.  The clinical method became re-invented in ethology as a valuable process of data acquisition (Brune, 2000).

Nesse (1999) suggests the following evolutionary explanations for disease in general, including mental disorders:

  1. Novelty

    1. From pathogens or competitors

    2. From aspects of the modern environment

  2. Trade-offs

    1. Genes with costs as well as benefits

    2. All traits have positive and negative trade-offs

  3. Constraints

  4. Accidents and mishaps too rare to shape defenses

  5. Defenses that are often confused with diseases

He argues that an evolutionary approach encourages sharp attention to distinction between manifestations of disease that are defects versus those that are defenses, and it forces us to acknowledge that much suffering can be adaptive.  

Bracha (2006) argues that classification of "stress and fear circuitry disorders" should be mode-of-acquisition and brain-evolution based. 

He argues for an evolutionary classification of anxiety disorders based on evolved fear circuitry traits that have outlived their usefulness, divided by four "time-depths" (inspired by the theory of the emergence of culture by Klein & Edgar, 2002 and derived from research reviewed by Dawkins (2004)

Bracha argues that each Era has produced a different type of fear-circuitry associated with characteristic anxiety disorders: 

Era Time-depth Fear circuits Inheritance type
1. Mesozoic Era mammalian-wide 
evolved fear circuits (fear adaptations)
140,000,000 yrs Extreme fear of adult non-kin males in toddlers 

Extreme fear of high elevations in adults 

Separation anxiety

"Normal fears", probably hard-wired by wild-type alleles nearing fixation in humans and most other mammals 
2. Cenozoic Era 
simian-wide 
evolved fear circuits
20,000,000 yrs Fear of snakes 

Fear of reptiles

Fear of confined spaces 

Fear of darkness

Fear of water immersion

CO2-induced panic attack (fear of suffocation during forest fire?)

Lactate-induced panic attack (fear of muscle exhaustion while under predation?)

Acute-fear-induced jaw-clenching and chronic stress-induced incisor-grinding

Limbic circuits posited to be firm-wired (strongly prepotentiated) by alleles that are the major variants in a stable polymorphism. As a result, simians may have a phylogenetically prepotentiated predisposition to acquire instantaneously fears of certain objects or situations that may have once have posed a life threat to early simian ancestors.  
3. Mid/Upper Paleolithic 
H. Sapiens-wide 
evolved fear circuits
200,000-70,000 yrs (mid)

70,000-12,000 yrs (upper)

Compulsive lock checking

Compulsive stove checking

Compulsive washing and obsessive fear of contamination

Compulsive hoarding (especially of tools, weapons and leather goods)

Extreme fear of insects or mice

Fear of scrutiny by non-kin conspecifics (Generalized Social Phobia)

Firm-wired in a small % of extant humans by common minor alleles that spread from single ancestral copies primarily driven by mate choice related stabilising selection
4. Neolithic culture-bound genome specific evolved fear circuits 12,000 years UNLOCALIZED (PSEUDO-SOMATIC) SYMPTOMS IN THE CONVERSIVE DISSOCIATIVE SPECTRUM:

Pseudo-cytokine-driven (pseudo-infectious) fear symptoms 

Epidemic pseudo-cytokine driven (pseudo-infectious) fear symptoms

Primary dissociative disorder?

PSEUDO-LOCALIZED (PSEUDONEUROLOGICAL “CONVERSIVE”)
SYMPTOMS: 

Psychogenic non-epileptic attacks (pseudoseizures)

Epidemic sociogenic illness “epidemic hysteria”

Psychogenic pseudoparalysis (e.g. limping)

Psychogenic imbalance (Pseudocerebellar symptoms)

Psychogenic blindness

Species atypical (psychopathological) fear circuits firm-wired (prepotentiated) in a small no. of extant humans by previously rare allele variants, spread after the emergence of human Neolithic tribalism (cultures) & mostly by gene-culture co-evolution & by mate-choice driven stabilising selection.

More in detail can be found in the Anxiety Disorders page. 

Bracha argues for a new category - "overconsolidational disorders" - "anchored around PTSD". He suggests a broader "overconsolidational spectrum category" that "straddles the fear circuitry spectrum disorders and the affective spectrum disorders categories".  

 



home

EPIG ] Evolutionary Models ] [ EP Classification ] EP Seminar 2006 ]

Citation suggestion: Dr Gary Galambos, Evolutionary Psychiatry Classification Intro (http://www.ep.org.au/classif/intro.htm) [date accessed]
The materials provided on this website may be freely cited but reposting on other websites, publishing or other reproductions, whole or in part, are subject to the written permission of Gary Galambos. Images may be reproduced provided the source is properly acknowledged.  
Site Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Dr Gary Galambos M.B.B.S. F.R.A.N.Z.C.P.
Page last updated: 02 December 2007